<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Artículos Académicos</title>
<link href="http://dspace.infodocu.lbd.org.es/xmlui/handle/123456789/1533" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle>Artículos Académicos relacionados con Conflictos Internacionales</subtitle>
<id>http://dspace.infodocu.lbd.org.es/xmlui/handle/123456789/1533</id>
<updated>2026-05-22T19:05:50Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-05-22T19:05:50Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Russia’s approach to multilateral cooperation in the post-Soviet space</title>
<link href="http://dspace.infodocu.lbd.org.es/xmlui/handle/123456789/1675" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Stephen, Aris</name>
</author>
<id>http://dspace.infodocu.lbd.org.es/xmlui/handle/123456789/1675</id>
<updated>2026-04-10T01:01:39Z</updated>
<published>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Russia’s approach to multilateral cooperation in the post-Soviet space
Stephen, Aris
In the last decade, Russia has developed a more nuanced approach to multilateralism in the post-Soviet space.&#13;
Having become disillusioned with the CIS, the Russian leadership has focussed on cooperation in specific fields with certain states in CSTO and EurAsEC, while SCO has provided scope for cooperation in tandem with China, another major power in Eurasia. Moscow has successfully managed to keep what it considers strategic areas of cooperation within CSTO and EurAsEC, thus not involving China in these areas,&#13;
while at the same time benefiting from tying itself to the resources and international standing of China in&#13;
SCO. This mixed approach has enabled Russia to reassert its place as the leader of multilateralism in parts&#13;
of the post-Soviet space.
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) and Central Asian Region: Opportunities and Challenges</title>
<link href="http://dspace.infodocu.lbd.org.es/xmlui/handle/123456789/1674" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Javaid, Faisal</name>
</author>
<id>http://dspace.infodocu.lbd.org.es/xmlui/handle/123456789/1674</id>
<updated>2026-04-10T01:01:36Z</updated>
<published>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) and Central Asian Region: Opportunities and Challenges
Javaid, Faisal
The Commonwealth of Independent States gave basis for the&#13;
establishment of Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO). It&#13;
has been playing an important security role in the Central Asian&#13;
region. Russia is inclined to capitalize on the organization to maintain&#13;
its sphere of influence in the energy-rich region. For Russia, the&#13;
expansion of NATO and American sway may create some stumbling&#13;
blocks in terms of security. This paper examines the emergence of&#13;
Russian commanded security alliance, CSTO and gives brief overview&#13;
(such as formation, structure and objectives) of CSTO. The research&#13;
paper also examines the CSTO’s role and opportunities in Central Asia&#13;
and discusses the challenges created by the Unites States.
</summary>
<dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>2022 January Events and CSTO Peacekeeping Mission in Kazakhstan</title>
<link href="http://dspace.infodocu.lbd.org.es/xmlui/handle/123456789/1672" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Syssoyeva, Rigina V.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Syssoyeva, Rigina V.</name>
</author>
<id>http://dspace.infodocu.lbd.org.es/xmlui/handle/123456789/1672</id>
<updated>2026-04-10T01:01:36Z</updated>
<published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">2022 January Events and CSTO Peacekeeping Mission in Kazakhstan
Syssoyeva, Rigina V.; Syssoyeva, Rigina V.
In January 2022, Kazakhstan was faced with an attempt of a violent change of power in the form of&#13;
mass protests that spread throughout the country and were organized with the basic techniques of color revolutions.&#13;
The country’s own law enforcement forces were not able to cope with radical citizens, looters-rioters, and terrorists,&#13;
and in these circumstances the head of state, K.K. Tokayev, decided to request the support of the Collective Security&#13;
Treaty Organization (CSTO) allies, who immediately sent the united peacekeeping troops to the republic. The&#13;
CSTO peacekeeping mission, coordinated by Russia, successfully restored constitutional order in the country and&#13;
prevented a violent coup d’état. The purpose of this research is to analyze the course of the January events and&#13;
actions of the CSTO, as well as their impact on Kazakhstan, the region and the organization itself. The paper is&#13;
based on interviews with experts from the CSTO member states, studies carried out in this area of research, and&#13;
statements by official authorities. The synthesis of the research results is divided into thematic blocks and&#13;
supplemented by the author’s conclusions. The paper mentions aspects such as the transition of power, changes in&#13;
Kazakhstan’s domestic and foreign policies, the effectiveness of the CSTO organization and the expansion of its&#13;
potential use. Proposals are also provided regarding the strengthening of defense integration and the need to develop&#13;
a common regional identity. The research is unique in that it brings expert opinions from six CSTO member states,&#13;
the results of studies carried out by researchers from Russia, Kazakhstan, and abroad, and the theoretical&#13;
terminology of Western political ideology. The author presents the area of responsibility of the CSTO as a Eurasian&#13;
security community based not only on collective security, but also on economic interdependence and a sense of&#13;
community among the nations of its member states.
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Requiem for the Unipolar Moment in Nagorny Karabakh</title>
<link href="http://dspace.infodocu.lbd.org.es/xmlui/handle/123456789/1586" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Broers, Laurence</name>
</author>
<id>http://dspace.infodocu.lbd.org.es/xmlui/handle/123456789/1586</id>
<updated>2026-04-09T14:34:13Z</updated>
<published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Requiem for the Unipolar Moment in Nagorny Karabakh
Broers, Laurence
In the wave of self-determination conflicts that became a hallmark of the Soviet dissolution in the Caucasus, the Armenian–Azerbaijani conflict over Nagorny Karabakh was always an outlier. It certainly shared formative attributes with subsequent conflicts in Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Chechnya: contested Soviet border delimitations, nationalist movements sweeping decrepit communist power structures aside, and the weak, fractious statehood of the republics that succeeded Soviet rule in December 1991. The secessionist victory in the first Karabakh war of 1992–94 was also consistent with the wider post-Soviet trend. With Armenia’s support, the Armenians of Nagorny Karabakh broke away from Azerbaijan and established their own, unrecognized Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (NKR).
</summary>
<dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
